Indeed, vigorous vines tend to
have lower fruitfulness, but this is also
partly due to shading.
Water — Too much water decreases
inflorescence; water deficit does not.4
The affect of over-watering is thought
to be indirect; water encourages excessive
canopy growth, which shades the
canes and draws carbohydrates away
from the buds. Irrigation maintaining
between 60% and 80% of full ET maximized
bud fruitfulness.4
Nitrogen — Nitrogen deficiency
reduces fruitfulness.2 On the other
hand, too much nitrogen causes rapid
shoot growth, which will pull carbohydrates
away from the buds and reduce
their fruitfulness.
Mineral deficiencies — There is
some evidence that lack of phosphorus
or potassium reduces bud fruitfulness.2
Low phosphorus around bud break is
sometimes caused by cold soil that prevents
uptake by the roots, even if the soil
has enough of themineral. Potassiumor
phosphorus can be added by foliar
sprays. The applications would need to
be shortly after bud break to increase
fruitfulness in the first several buds. No
experiments have yet been performed to
test this idea.
Plant growth regulator compounds
— Plants regulate inflorescence by the
interaction of gibberrellic acid (GA)
and cytokinins.4 At an early stage, GA
increases inflorescence by favoring formation
of anlage. But later, GA
decreases inflorescence by favoring the
alternative path to tendril formation.2,4
Cytokinins increase inflorescence by
favoring inflorescence over tendrils.
They also regulated flower differentiation
just before budbreak.4
Cytokinins are produced naturally
in the plant, and they can be augmented
with kelp sprays. It might be
worthwhile to experiment with kelp in
blocks with low fruitfulness, or in
years with cold spring weather. Kelp
has not been proven to contain the
correct cytokinins for grapes; more
research is needed.
Adding too much gibberellin can
reduce inflorescences,2 but gibberellin
is not normally applied soon after bud
break. It is more important during the
necrosis period, after bloom.
|
Plant-mediated bud necrosis. The primary bud is dead above an abscission layer.
|
Plant-mediated Bud Necrosis
After the anlage differentiates into
either a flower cluster primodia or a
tendril, the budmust survive until bud
break in the following year to be of any
use. Depending on conditions in the
vine and the environment, the vine
may sacrifice a number of buds to
“bud necrosis” or death.
In plant-mediated bud necrosis
(PMBN), the middle section of the primary
bud dies above an apparent abscission
layer. Presumably the necrosis is initiated
by some plant hormone. The dead
section rather quickly turns into brown
fluff that breaks away from the bud
when pushed. The two secondary buds
usually survive. This kind of necrosis is
often called primary bud necrosis (PBN),
but injury can also cause necrosis of primary
buds (see photo, page 13).
The few studies investigating
PMBN indicate that it usually occurs
during the first one or two months following
bloom. During this time, carbohydrates
are flowing preferentially to
the current season’s flower clusters
and young berries, leaving less for the
developing buds.
|
Carbohydrate shortage, shading,
shoot vigor, and excessive gibberellin
have been shown to promote PMBN.
Low carbohydrates — Many studies
point to the role of a low level of
carbohydrates in PMBN. Buds with
lower carbohydrate levels are more
likely to die. More vigorous shoots
tend to have less carbohydrates and
more necrosis than weaker shoots.
Grape varieties that tend to have more
carbohydrates also tend to be more
resistant to PMBN.5,6
A study in Virginia found more
PMBN in several varieties with low
carbohydrates (Riesling, Syrah, and
Viognier) than in one with high carbohydrates
(Chardonnay).6
By the time PMBN starts, after
bloom, the carbohydrate contribution
of the leaves is presumably more
important than reserves in the wood
and roots. In a healthy vine, the leaves
will be supplying new reserves, in
addition to growing the current year’s
fruit, andmaintaining next year’s buds.
|