Vineyard Pruning and Thinning
Vineyard pruning and thinning
practices may increase soil carbon
storage if the extracted biomass
remains in the vineyard. Similarly,
the dropping of fruit can be a valuable
carbon input. Removal of dead
vines represents a loss of carbon storage
unless the vines are chipped and
left in the vineyard.
Hedgerows and Native Vegetation
Planting hedgerows and conserving or
restoring natural vegetationmay substantially
reduce the vineyard GHG footprint.
Carbon
|
stored in these woody long-lived
plants can represent a large source of
sequestered carbon, significantly decreasing
overall GHG emissions.
Oak woodlands, for example, store
huge amounts of above- and belowground
carbon over their lifetime.
Moreover, hedgerows and native vegetation
within the vineyard landscape
decrease the collective environmental
impact of viticultural activities by decreasing
soil erosion and the leaching of fertilizers
into surface and groundwater.
|
Summary
Table I shows the relative impact of
vineyard practices on the atmospheric
GHGs – CO2, N2O, and CH4 –
according to scientific understanding.
While more research is needed to
address knowledge gaps and better
understand how practices definitively
impact the carbon footprint, Table I can
help practitioners identify and consider
practices to continually enhance
reductions in their vineyard carbon
footprint.
|
|
|
Development of third-party certification
|
SWP certification
Given the market and regulatory
climate, CSWA has determined that
an option for third-party verification
of SWP participation is an appropriate
next step in the evolution of the
program and to maintain the
California wine industry’s leadership
position and commitment to
transparency. Certification can serve
as a tool to speed adoption of sustainable
practices, communicate with
stakeholders that are increasingly
interested in sustainable business
practices, and increase transparency
and ensure confidence of progress on
these activities.
CSWA’s certification program
aims to advance the industry as a
whole. It is intended to be a catalyst
for continual improvement and to
support the entrance of members at
all stages of the sustainability journey
to participate and benefit from
the program, while enhancing the
credibility of the program through
third-party verification.
Because optimal economic, environmental
and social performance
differs depending on region, product,
business size, and other issues,
measuring continual improvement
to one’s own baseline performance is
a highly efficient and effective way
to advance an industry towards sustainability.
Through certification,
participants at all levels of achievement
would be able to receive thirdparty
verification that priority areas
for improvement are being identified
through self-assessment and subsequently
acted upon.
|
T
he California Sustainable Winegrowing
Alliance (CSWA) is currently
developing a third-party certification
program related to the California
Sustainable Winegrowing Program
(SWP). The purpose of the certification
programis to increase the sustainability of
the California wine industry by promoting
the adoption of sustainable practices
and ensuring continual improvement.
The certification pilot phase was
February to June 2009. CSWA hopes to
launch the certification program in
2009. CSWA is undertaking an external
stake holder outreach effort to ensure
transparency and credibility of the proposed
certification program.
SWP background
Building on major trends and successful
regional efforts, the Wine
Institute and the California Association
of Winegrape Growers (CAWG)
launched the SWP in 2002 to give
growers and vintners educational tools
to increase adoption of sustainable
practices and to measure and demonstrate
ongoing improvement. Wine
Institute and CAWG formed CSWA in
2003 to help implement the SWP.
The SWP is based on the “Cycle of
Continuous Improvement” concept.
Participants assess their operations
using a comprehensive “Code of
Sustainable
|
Winegrowing Practices”
workbook, interpret their results using
customized reports that benchmark their practices relative to statewide and
regional averages, attend targeted education
workshops to learn about best
practices, develop Action Plans on
areas they want to improve, implement
change, and reassess, beginning the
cycle again.
Nearly 1,500 vintners and growers
— representing approximately 60% of
the state’s wine production and vineyard
acreage — have self-assessed
their operations in 125 workshops and
more than 5,500 have attended 160 targeted
education workshops. Statewide
Sustainability Reports, beginning with
a 2004 Sustainability Report, document
results, identify strengths and opportunities
for improvement, and set goals
to increase the use of sustainable practices.
A 2009 Sustainability Report will
provide in-depth analysis on the status
of the industry relative to the improvement
targets that were published in the
2004 Report.
The Sustainability Reports are available
online. There
are only two reports: 2004 and 2006.
Valuable input from a broad range
of stakeholders was received during
development of the Code. Expertise
and resources are leveraged with government,
academic, and non-governmental
partners.
|