During alcoholic fermentation the
microflora present can utilize macro
and micronutrients. This may result
in a nutrient-depleted environment
for the fastidious O. oeni. From a
nutritional standpoint, Oenococcus
spp. require amino acids, as they
do not have the ability to assimilate
ammonium salts. The individual
amino acids that the bacteria
require vary depending on the strain.
Using knock-out studies, it has been
observed that some strains require
as many as 13 of the 20 amino acids.7
These amino acids are deemed to be
essential, and others may be necessary
as well. If they are not present,
growth cannot occur.
In addition to amino acids, it is
essential that wine bacteria are supplied
with peptides, vitamins (biotin,
thiamine, nicotinic acid, and pantothenic
acid), and minerals (manganese,
potassium, and magnesium).
Since we have no practical means
of determining amino acid deficiencies
for bacteria, we may not be aware
that the bacteria are encountering a
nutritionally-depleted environment.
We can, however, “guestimate” if we
know both the yeast assimilable nitrogen
concentration at the beginning of
the alcoholic fermentation plus the
specific nitrogen requirements of the
wine yeast used.
S. cerevisiae are classed as low,
medium, medium-high, high, and
very high with regards to their nitrogen
requirements. The different yeast
strains available vary significantly in
the amount of nitrogen they need to
assimilate 1 g/L of sugar. This amount
may vary from 0.5 to 1.35 ppm of available
nitrogen, with the ex-S. bayanus
strains requiring even more.6
Other lesser known factors can also
cause inhibition of bacteria. These
include alterations in acidity due to
either the utilization of malic acid by
yeast (or other bacteria) or by production
of succinic acid.4 Production of
the aromatic compound ß-phenylethanol
(floral) by cryotolerant yeast
species can also have a negative effect
on the growth of O. oeni.1
Inhibition of S. cerevisiae by O. oeni
In certain situations during the alcoholic
fermentation, the presence of
O. oeni can have a negative effect on
S. cerevisiae. Some bacteria have the
ability to utilize the grape sugars and
produce acetic acid. It has been
|
speculated
that acetic acid alone may not be
antagonistic, but when in combination
with other metabolites, it can lead to
an accelerated death of wine yeast.
Suggested causes of accelerated
death include the formation of inhibitory
metabolites or depletion of essential
nutrients and survival factors that
are essential to the wine yeast. Other
bacterial inhibitors that may have a
negative effect on wine yeast include
bacterial protease production, extracellular
glucanase activity, and bacteriocin-
like inhibitors.1
Stimulatory interactions
Not only negative interactions can
occur. S. cerevisiae can stimulate the
growth of O. oeni. This stimulation
is thought to be related to the
yeast autolysis rate. It is during yeast
autolysis that the nutritional composition
of the matrix is altered, favoring
the release of mannoproteins
and amino acids.
The released mannoproteins have
a dual function. They can detoxify
the medium and protect the cells
from potential polyphenolic inhibition.
Mannoproteins may have an
additional role in enhancing the
nutritional content of the wine. This
is possibly due to the glycosidase
activity in O. oeni that results in
hydrolysis of the mannoprotein. The
release of amino acids and peptides
can shorten the lag phase of the bacteria
and increase the biomass. Yeast
autolysis rates are highly strain- and
environment-dependent.
To help the winemaker make decisions
on yeast/bacteria compatibility,
Table II has been developed by
Lallemand (adapted for strains available
in the North American market).
Based on current knowledge, the
success of malolactic fermentation is
due to the winemaker’s strain choice(s)
for alcoholic and malolactic fermentations,
environmental conditions, and
winemaking practices employed.
It is recommended that the
malolactic fermentation be planned
in conjunction with the alcoholic
fermentation in order to maintain
wine quality and consistency. Table
III summarizes the many factors
that can play a role in the outcome
of malolactic fermentation.
|
If your wine shows that favorable
or mildly difficult conditions exist, a
direct bacteria addition can be used.
If the conditions indicate that harsher
conditions exist, the best approach
would be to try a one-step formulation
(final acclimatization conducted in
your wine). If extreme conditions are
apparent, a standard build-up culture
would be recommended.
References
1. Alexandre, H., P.J. Costello, F. Remize,
J. Guzzo, and M. Guilloux-Benateir. 2004
“Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Oenococcus oeni
interactions in wine: Current knowledge and
perspectives.” Int. J. of Food Microbiology 93:
141-154.
2. Arnink, K. and T. Henick-Kling. 2005
“Influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and
Oenococcus oeni strains on successful malolactic
conversion in wine.” Amer. J. of Enology &
Viticulture 56 (3): 228-238
3. Comitini, F., F. Ferretti, I. Mannazzu,
and M. Ciani. 2005 “Interactions between
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and malolactic bacteria:
preliminary characterization of a yeast proteinaceous
compound(s) against Oenococcus
oeni.” J. of Applied Microbiology 99: 105-111.
4. Déléris-Bou, M., S. Kreiger-Weber, and
G. Specht. 2011 Proceedings: 2nd international
wine microbiology symposium. In conjunction
with California State University, Fresno.
5. Delteil D. 2004 “Yeast/bacteria interactions:
Practical aspects in Mediterranean
and Rhone red wines.” The Australian & New
Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker February:
58-61.
6. Julien, A., J-L Roustan, L. Dulau, and J-M
Sablayrolles. 2000 “Comparison of nitrogen
and oxygen demands of enological yeast:
Technological consequences.” Amer. J. of
Enology & Viticulture 51 (3): 215-222.
7. Terrade, N. and R. Mira de Ordu. 2009
“Determination of the essential nutrients
of wine related bacteria from the genera
Oenococcus and Lactobacillus.” Int. J. of Food
Microbiology 133, 1-2, 8-13.
8. Lonvaud-Funel, A., V. Renouf, and P.
Strehiano. 2009 Microbiologie du vin. Editions
Tec&Doc, Chapter 1, 35 (Translation by
Déléris-Bou).Oenococcus oeni.” J. of Applied
Microbiology 99: 105-111.
|